ORGANIZATIONS
I work with organizations seeking rigorous, evidence-informed analysis of systems that are not functioning as intended—and guidance on how those systems can be redesigned to reduce predictable harm and improve outcomes.
My work focuses on identifying where institutional practices diverge from evidence, autonomy, and lived reality, particularly in systems governing recovery, family regulation, social services, and related policy domains. Engagements are designed to support organizational leaders, policymakers, and practitioners in aligning policy, implementation, and decision-making with stated goals, legal mandates, and empirical evidence.
Areas of Engagement
Organizations typically engage my work when they are confronting:
-
Persistent gaps between policy intent and operational outcomes
-
Programs that produce predictable harm despite good intentions
-
Institutional practices that undermine autonomy, credibility, or trust
-
Compliance-driven systems that conflict with evidence or best practice
-
High-stakes decision-making in complex or politically sensitive contexts
My analysis centers on structural design, incentive alignment, and implementation realities—not individual blame or surface-level reform.
How I Work With Organizations
My work is analytical, structured, and outcome-oriented. Depending on organizational needs, engagements may include:
-
Policy and program analysis
-
Systems mapping and institutional diagnostics
-
Evidence reviews and synthesis
-
Advisory support for leadership or cross-functional teams
-
Written briefings, white papers, or strategic recommendations
All engagements are grounded in empirical evidence, autonomy-preserving frameworks, and real-world operating conditions.